Skip to main content

Governed content at scale

Drupal Enterprise Platform

Drupal earns its place when a website has hundreds of editors, real approval workflows and compliance that is audited. We have built these platforms for a technical university and for a BFSI group, which is where this work actually gets tested.

Drupal Enterprise Platform

What Drupal Enterprise Platform covers

Drupal earns its place in a narrow set of situations: hundreds of editors with genuinely different permissions, approval workflows that must be provable, content in several languages, and audits that ask who changed what and when. Outside those, it is heavier than the job needs.

Inside them it is very hard to beat, and it is where a Drupal enterprise platform is worth the investment. We have built these for a technical university and for an insurance broker, both on our work page, where the interesting problems were editorial governance and integration rather than the front end.

This is also the least crowded thing we do. Most agencies that list Drupal have not run a large editorial team on it, and the difference shows up in exactly the places that are expensive to fix later: content modelling, permissions, and how upgrades are handled.

Drupal Enterprise Platform Intro

Is this the right fit?

A fit when

  • Many editors across departments, each needing different permissions
  • Content has to pass an approval workflow before it goes live
  • Accessibility compliance is audited rather than aspired to
  • Several sites need to share content, components and branding
  • The platform has to still be maintainable in ten years

The wrong choice when

  • A marketing site with three editors, where Drupal is heavier than the job needs
  • Speed to launch matters more than governance
  • Nobody internally will own content structure, because Drupal rewards that ownership and punishes its absence
  • You want a store, which is a commerce platform decision instead

What you get

Content architecture

Content types, taxonomy and reusable components designed around how your organisation actually publishes, not around the pages that exist today.

Roles and workflow

Permissions per department, editorial workflow with review and approval, and an audit trail of who changed what.

Multi-site and multi-language

Shared components and content across sites and languages, so a change is made once rather than in eleven places.

Compliance and accessibility

WCAG 2.2 built into the component library, so new pages are accessible by default instead of remediated later.

Integrations

Single sign-on, CRM, student or policy systems, and whatever internal service holds the data your site has to show.

Long-term maintainability

Configuration in code, automated deployment, and a documented upgrade path. Drupal projects fail on maintenance, not on build.

How it runs

  1. Content and governance audit

    What you publish, who publishes it and who has to approve it. This decides the architecture, and getting it wrong is the expensive mistake in Drupal.

  2. Architecture

    Content types, taxonomy, component library and permission model, documented and agreed before any site building starts.

  3. Build and migrate

    Platform built in increments, with content migrated from whatever you run now and old URLs mapped to new ones.

  4. Training and handover

    Your editors trained on the workflow, and documentation written for the developer who inherits this in five years.

Built with

The platform and the tools around it. Nothing here is chosen because it is new.

Part of Web Application Development

  • Drupal 10
  • PHP 8
  • Symfony
  • MySQL
  • PostgreSQL
  • Solr
  • Redis
  • Docker
  • Terraform

Delivered like this

Questions we get asked

Why Drupal and not WordPress?

Governance. Drupal handles complex permissions, editorial workflow and structured content natively, where WordPress needs plugins to approximate them. For a marketing site WordPress is the better answer and we will say so.

Is Drupal still a safe choice?

For this kind of platform, yes. It has a predictable release cycle, a security team and long support windows, which matters far more than framework fashion when the platform has to run for a decade.

Can you work with our existing Drupal team?

Yes. That is a staff augmentation arrangement rather than a project, and it is often the right shape when you already have people who know the platform.

How long does a platform like this take?

It depends entirely on the content audit, which is why we do that first and quote afterwards. A delivery date given before anyone has seen your content structure is a guess.

What about hosting?

We work with Acquia, Pantheon and plain cloud infrastructure. The choice affects your team more than it affects us, so it is a decision we make with you.

Tell us what you are building.

Send the problem and any constraints you already know about. You get a scope, an approach, and a real cost range - written by a person.

No sales sequence. One person reads this and replies. Rather give more detail?