Cross-platform apps
One codebase for iOS and Android in Flutter or React Native. The right choice when the two apps should behave the same and your team is small.
Mobile Engineering
Mobile App Development
Apps that feel native on both platforms, not a website in a shell. Most of the cost in mobile is not the build. It is the store review, the device spread, and everything you cannot patch in an afternoon.
Mobile App Development, in practice
The build is rarely what makes a mobile project expensive. It is the second platform, the range of devices real customers actually hold, the store review that lands two days before launch, and the fact that a bug shipped to the App Store cannot be patched the same afternoon a website can.
So the useful conversation with a mobile app development company in Delhi starts earlier than most people expect: does this need to be an app at all? If it does not use the camera, work offline, or send notifications people would miss, a fast responsive website costs less to build and much less to keep alive. We would rather tell you that now than eighteen months in.
Where an app is genuinely the answer, we build cross platform by default and go native when a specific requirement earns it. We have no published mobile case study yet, and we are not going to dress up website work as one. Judge this page on how it reasons, then ask us hard questions.
What we build
Native iOS and Android
Swift and Kotlin, for apps that lean on the platform. Background work, hardware access and heavy graphics are where native still wins clearly.
Backend and API work
The services your app talks to. Sync, auth, push and versioning designed so an old app in the wild does not break your new server.
Offline and sync
Local storage, queued actions and a written rule for what wins when two devices disagree. Apps that assume a live connection lose data in the field.
Payments and subscriptions
In-app purchase, store billing rules and payment gateways. Store policy decides more of this than your product does.
Release and store submission
Build pipelines, signing, staged rollout and review submission. We handle the rejections too.
Performance and crash work
Startup time, jank and crash rates measured on real devices rather than a simulator on a fast laptop.
Analytics and instrumentation
Knowing which screens people actually use, so the next release is decided by evidence rather than opinion.
How we approach it
What is different about how this team does the work, rather than what every agency says about it.
-
We choose the platform from your constraints
Cross-platform is cheaper to build and maintain. Native is better when the app leans on hardware or platform features. We say which one fits and why, before quoting.
-
We build for the devices your users own
Not the newest phone in the office. Older Android hardware and small screens are where apps fall over, so they are tested first, not last.
-
We plan for app store review
Review rejections are a schedule risk, not a surprise. Store rules go into scoping, and submission is a stage in the plan with time around it.
-
We assume the network fails
Queueing, retries and conflict rules are designed in. Retrofitting offline behaviour into an app that assumed connectivity is close to a rewrite.
Built with
Chosen for what the project needs, not for what is new. If you already have a stack, we work in it.
- Flutter
- React Native
- Swift (iOS)
- Kotlin (Android)
- Firebase
- Node.js
- REST APIs
- GraphQL
Questions we get asked
Should we build one app or two?
One, in most cases. Flutter and React Native produce apps that feel native on both platforms, cost less to build, and cost far less to maintain, because a fix lands in both at once. Two native apps are worth it when the product leans on platform features, heavy graphics, or long-running background work. We will tell you which case you are in during scoping, and we will explain the reasoning rather than just the recommendation.
Do we need an app at all?
Often not, and it is worth asking early. A fast responsive website does the job for anything a person visits occasionally. An app earns its cost when there is repeat use: notifications people want, offline work, or hardware the browser cannot reach. Building an app for a service used once a month is an expensive way to get a bookmark, and we would rather say so than take the project.
Who owns the app store accounts?
You do, always. The developer accounts, signing certificates and store listings are registered in your company name from the start. Agencies that hold these on a client's behalf create a dependency nobody benefits from except the agency. We set them up correctly at the beginning, because moving them later is genuinely painful.
What happens after launch?
Mobile needs more ongoing work than web does. Operating systems update twice a year, store rules change, and old versions of your app stay installed on real phones for a long time. We agree a support arrangement before launch that covers OS updates, store compliance and crash monitoring, rather than negotiating one during an outage.
Thinking about an app?
Tell us what it needs to do and who will use it. We will tell you honestly whether an app is the right answer.