Mahindra Insurance Brokers Limited (MIBL)
Enterprise Drupal Modernization for BFSI Leaders
- Drupal
- PHP 8
- Enterprise Cloud
Off an unsupported version
Drupal 7 reached end of life and stopped receiving security fixes. Sites still on it are running unpatched, and most of them are the sites an organisation depends on most. This is the work of getting off, in stages, with the site live throughout.
Drupal 7 reached end of life and no longer receives security fixes. Sites still running on it are unpatched, and in our experience they are usually the sites an organisation depends on most, which is precisely why nobody has wanted to touch them.
A Drupal migration is not a redesign, and treating it as one is what turns a contained project into an open ended one. The work is moving content, structure, users and URLs onto a supported version with the site still behaving as people expect. A redesign can follow once you are safe, as a separate decision with its own budget.
The part that decides whether it succeeded is the least visible: every existing URL mapped to its replacement and redirected. Search rankings survive a migration when that map is complete, and they are lost when it is an afterthought. We treat it as a deliverable, not as a launch day task.
What is on the current site, what is worth bringing, what has not been visited in three years. Usually a third of the content does not need to move.
Migration written as repeatable code, not manual copying. It can be re-run as often as needed, which is what lets the old site stay live until the last day.
Every old URL mapped to its new destination, redirects tested before launch. This is where most migrations quietly lose their traffic.
What has a Drupal 10 equivalent, what has to be rewritten, and what was only ever needed by a feature nobody uses now.
The new platform built alongside the old one, with content re-synced until cutover. No freeze while the build happens.
A planned switch at a quiet hour, with a tested way back if something is wrong. Nobody should be improvising on launch night.
A written report on the current site: content volume, custom code, modules without a forward path, and what the migration will actually involve. You get this before committing to the build.
The migration written as code and run repeatedly into the new platform, so problems surface early rather than on cutover weekend.
Content checked against the source, redirects tested, and the new site crawled to catch what the migration missed.
The switch, at a low-traffic hour, watched. Search Console and analytics monitored for the following weeks so a ranking drop is caught in days.
The platform and the tools around it. Nothing here is chosen because it is new.
Enterprise Drupal Modernization for BFSI Leaders
Engineering a Scalable Drupal Platform for a Premier Technical University
Not if the redirects are done properly, and that is the part we spend most care on. Every old URL is mapped and tested before cutover, and we watch Search Console afterwards rather than assuming it went fine.
It should not be. The migration is written as repeatable code, so the old site keeps running and publishing until the day of cutover.
No, and you probably should not. A content audit usually finds a large share of pages that nobody has visited in years. Moving them costs money and dilutes the new site.
Common, and worth talking about. The first step is the same assessment: what was done, what is usable, and what it would take to finish rather than restart.
You can, but we price it as two pieces of work. Combining them makes it impossible to tell whether a traffic change came from the migration or the redesign.
Send the problem and any constraints you already know about. You get a scope, an approach, and a real cost range - written by a person.
Vikalp Development
We usually reply within one business day